Topic 3.17 · AA Higher Level

The coefficients point out of the plane

For 2x − y + 2z = 6 the vector (2, −1, 2) is the normal. Dot it with itself and you get 9, not 0, so it is nowhere near lying in the plane. The numbers in front of x, y and z point straight out.

(1, 2, 0)
0v · n
yeslies in the plane?
(2, −1, 2)the normal
in the planethis candidate is

The plane is drawn edge on, so it looks like a line. A vector in the plane lies flat along it; the normal stands straight up out of it. Those are the only two cases that matter.

Three forms, and which one to reach for

FormWrittenUse it when you have
Parametricr = a + sb + tcA point and two non-parallel vectors in the plane.
Scalar productr · n = a · nA point and the normal.
Cartesianax + by + cz = dAnything. It is the scalar product form multiplied out.

A plane needs two directions, because it is two-dimensional, which is why the parametric form has two parameters. Or it needs one normal, because a single perpendicular direction pins a plane down completely. Those are two ways of saying the same thing, and the normal version is almost always shorter.

For the plane through A(1, 2, 3) with normal n = (2, −1, 2):

r · n = a · n = (1)(2) + (2)(−1) + (3)(2) = 6

and writing r = (x, y, z) and multiplying out gives 2x − y + 2z = 6. The coefficients are the normal's components and the right-hand side is a · n.

So the coefficients are not a direction in the plane. Press through the candidates and watch the readout. (1, 2, 0) gives 0 and lies flat in the plane. (0, 2, 1) gives 0 as well. But (2, −1, 2), which is exactly the list of coefficients, gives 9, and a vector in the plane must give zero.

That is a useful thing to be able to say the right way round:

Reading the coefficients as a direction is the error that makes a line come out perpendicular to a plane when the question wanted it lying in one, and nothing about the answer looks wrong.

Going between the forms

Parametric to Cartesian: cross the two directions. Given the plane r = (1, 2, 3) + s(1, 2, 0) + t(0, 2, 1), the two directions are in the plane, so the normal is perpendicular to both, which is exactly what a vector product gives:

(1, 2, 0) × (0, 2, 1) = (2, −1, 2)

and then r · n = 6 as before. The cross product from 3.16 is the bridge between the two forms, which is the main reason that sub-topic comes first. Check it the usual way: (2, −1, 2) dotted with each of the two directions gives 0.

Cartesian to parametric: read the normal off, then find two vectors perpendicular to it. That is easier than it sounds, because you only need any two that work, and they do not have to be tidy.

Testing whether a point is on a plane is one substitution. For 2x − y + 2z = 6:

Point2x − y + 2zOn the plane?
(1, 2, 3)6yes
(2, 4, 3)6yes
(3, 4, 2)6yes
(1, 2, 2)4no
(0, 0, 0)0no

The last row is worth noticing: the origin is on the plane exactly when d = 0. So a Cartesian equation with no constant term describes a plane through the origin, which is a free piece of information about any such equation.

On the GDC: building a plane from a point and two directions

The one real computation here is the cross product that turns two in-plane directions into a normal, and that is worth checking because the component pattern is fiddly. Everything else is one substitution.

When you may use it. Analysis Paper 1 is non-calculator, and plane work is nearly all Paper 1: the normals and the constants are whole numbers by design. The machine is for confirming a cross product.

TI-Nspire CX II

  1. Store the two in-plane directions as b and c, and the point as a
  2. crossP(b,c) gives [[2][-1][2]], which is the normal
  3. Then the constant in one line: dotP(a,crossP(b,c)) gives 6, so the plane is 2x − y + 2z = 6
  4. The check: dotP(b,crossP(b,c)) and dotP(c,crossP(b,c)) both give 0, confirming the normal really is perpendicular to both directions

Casio fx-CG50

  1. MENU → Vector, define VctA for the point and VctB, VctC for the two directions, all 3×1
  2. OPTN → CrossP: CrossP(VctB,VctC) gives the normal (2, -1, 2)
  3. OPTN → DotP: DotP(VctA,CrossP(VctB,VctC)) gives 6
  4. To test a point, just evaluate the expression in Run-Matrix: for (1, 2, 2), 2(1)-2+2(2) gives 4, which is not 6, so it is off the plane

The mark people lose. Using a direction in the plane where the normal was needed. Both are three numbers, both look like vectors, and the resulting equation is a perfectly well-formed plane equation for the wrong plane. The habit: after writing any plane equation, dot its coefficients with a direction you know is in the plane and check you get zero. One line, and it catches the whole class of error.

Your turn

Throughout: the plane through A(1, 2, 3) with normal n = (2, −1, 2).

1. Find the constant d in 2x − y + 2z = d.

2. Find (1, 2, 0) · n.

3. Find n · n.

4. Evaluate 2x − y + 2z at the point (1, 2, 2).

5. What do the coefficients 2, −1 and 2 in 2x − y + 2z = 6 represent?

Question 5. What do the coefficients 2, minus 1 and 2 represent?
Where the marks go

1 markThe normal, found or quoted correctly.

1 markThe constant, from a · n.

1 markThe equation in the form the question asked for.

If the question gives two directions in the plane, the first mark is the cross product and it is worth two of the three marks' worth of effort. Write the normal down on its own line before assembling the equation, so it earns its mark even if the constant goes wrong.

Want a verdict on your own draft?

These pages are free and stay free, but they are general and your IA is not. Send me your research question, or whatever exists so far, and I will tell you in writing whether the topic has a ceiling on it, where the marks are going, and what to change first. That costs nothing and it comes back within 24 hours.

Written by a serving IB Diploma and Career-related Programme Coordinator and Head of Mathematics, who reads internal assessments across every subject group every year. If you then want the whole draft reviewed properly against all five criteria, that is the paid one, and it is refunded if it does not name at least three specific things to fix.

Send me your question, free

Already have a full draft? Have the whole thing reviewed against all five criteria, $99.