Three real outcomes, and the row that announces which.
Ask what 0 = 0 means before you show the third case.
Most will say they have made a mistake. It means the second equation told them nothing new, so the solutions form a whole line. 0 = 5 means the equations contradict and nothing satisfies both.
Neither is an error. Students who believe every system has one solution hunt for a slip that is not there, lose the time, and then write nothing.
Swapping rows, scaling a row, and adding a multiple of one row to another all leave the solution set untouched. That is why the method works, and it is worth one minute rather than presenting the moves as a ritual.
And back-substitution is the only check left. Once the rows have been manipulated there is no original working to review, so substituting into every original equation is not optional.
| 1. x | Adding gives 3x = 9, so x = 3. |
| 2. det[[1,1],[2,2]] | 1(2) - 1(2) = 0. |
| 3. Final row 0 = 5 | B, no solutions; the equations contradict. |
1 markNaming which of the three outcomes, in words.
1 markAn infinite solution set described with a parameter.
1 markSubstituting back into every original equation.
| They give | What it means |
|---|---|
| 1 (Q1) | Gave y. |
| 4 (Q2) | Added instead of subtracting in the determinant. |
| D, an error (Q3) | The belief this page exists to remove. 0 = 5 is a result, not a slip. |
| C (Q3) | Confused 0 = 5 with 0 = 0. One is impossible, the other is always true. |
"Can I just use the calculator?" For a well-behaved system, yes. It will not tell you clearly which of the three cases you are in, and that is usually what the question is about.
"How do I write infinitely many?" With a parameter: x = t, then y and z in terms of t. Writing "infinitely many" alone leaves marks behind.
"What does a zero determinant mean?" Not exactly one solution. It does not distinguish none from infinitely many, so you still have to look at the rows.
| What is happening | |
|---|---|
| 1 | The three cases on screen. What does 0 = 0 mean? |
| 2 | Row operations, and why they are allowed. |
| 3 | A 3x3 worked fully, with back-substitution. |
| 4 | A system with no solution and one with infinitely many. |
| 5 | Determinant as a quick warning. |
Do not present every example as having one solution. It builds the exact expectation that wastes exam time.
Do not accept "infinitely many" without a parameterised answer.
Three tiers, ramping the way practice should: the method on its own, then the method inside something real, then a challenge. Set the tier the class in front of you needs rather than one undifferentiated sheet. Answers are given so these can go straight onto a board.
The method on its own, with friendly numbers. Set these first and move on quickly once they are secure.
The same skill inside a real situation, where the first job is working out what is being asked.
Reasoning, working backwards, or spotting an error. These are where the top grades are decided.
Works on a phone. Nothing is loaded from any other site, so it runs behind a school firewall, and nothing a student does is saved or sent anywhere.