"Sketch the graph of y = x³ − 3x" is worth three marks. A correct, smooth, beautifully shaped curve with nothing written on it earns one. The shape was never the part being marked.
The same curve each time. What changes is what is written on it.
| Sketch | Draw | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | Not to scale. The shape and the relationships have to be right. | To scale, with points plotted and a ruler for any straight line. |
| Grid | Not needed. Plain paper is fine. | Expected, and the scale has to be stated. |
| Labels | Axes, and every key feature the question cares about. | Axes, and the scale on each. |
| How long | A minute, done properly. | Several minutes. If a question wants a draw it will give you a grid. |
Neither word means "rough". A sketch is a specification: the right shape, in the right place, with the right things named. It is faster than a draw because it does not need accuracy, not because it needs less thought.
For y = x³ − 3x, a sketch that earns everything shows:
A local maximum is not the maximum. The point (−1, 2) is the top of a hill, not the top of the graph: y = 10 gives 970 and it keeps going. Label it "local maximum" or "local max". A student who writes "maximum" has made a false claim about a cubic, and an examiner reading that cannot award the feature.
The syllabus asks specifically for transferring a graph from a screen to paper. Four things go wrong, in this order:
Sums and differences of functions. The syllabus expects you to graph f(x) + g(x) and f(x) − g(x) with technology, including functions that are not in this topic. There is nothing to learn: enter it as one expression. What is worth doing is predicting the shape first, then checking. For y = x³ − 3x, the x³ wins far from zero and the −3x wins near it, which is exactly why there are two turning points close to the origin and nothing else anywhere.
The default window hides features on almost every cubic, and a sketch copied from a window that hides them will be wrong in a way nobody can see from the drawing.
When you may use it. Applications allows a calculator in every paper. Analysis does not allow one in Paper 1, where a sketch has to come from the algebra: factorise for the roots, differentiate for the turning points.
The mark people lose. Copying the window instead of the graph. On the default window this cubic is a near-vertical line through the origin and both turning points are invisible, so a sketch made from it has no features to label and cannot score. Set the window deliberately, find the features with the machine, and then draw. And on the Casio, G-SOLVE is SHIFT F5, not F5.
1. For y = x³ − 3x, give the largest root, to 2 decimal places.
2. What is the y-coordinate of the local maximum?
3. How many x-intercepts does it have?
4. A question says "sketch" and gives no grid. A student produces an accurate plot on squared paper with every point measured, and labels nothing. How many of the three marks?
5. Which label on (−1, 2) is correct?
1 markThe correct shape, with the right end behaviour.
1 markThe intercepts, marked and valued.
1 markThe turning points, with coordinates and the word "local".
And axes labelled, which is not usually its own mark but is a condition on the others: an examiner cannot read a coordinate off an unlabelled pair of lines.
These pages are free and stay free, but they are general and your IA is not. Send me your research question, or whatever exists so far, and I will tell you in writing whether the topic has a ceiling on it, where the marks are going, and what to change first. That costs nothing and it comes back within 24 hours.
Written by a serving IB Diploma and Career-related Programme Coordinator and Head of Mathematics, who reads internal assessments across every subject group every year. If you then want the whole draft reviewed properly against all five criteria, that is the paid one, and it is refunded if it does not name at least three specific things to fix.
Already have a full draft? Have the whole thing reviewed against all five criteria, $99.