AA Topic 5.13 · Analysis and Approaches HL

Close enough, every curve is its own tangent

Why replacing two functions by their derivatives works, when you are allowed to do it, and when you are not.

Higher Level

Both of these curves pass through zero at the same place, so the ratio is 0⁄0 and tells you nothing. Zoom in and watch them both straighten into their tangents. The ratio of two straight lines through the same point is just the ratio of their gradients.

wide
–f(x) ÷ g(x) nearby
–f′ ÷ g′ at the point
–the limit

Zoom all the way in and the two readouts meet.

The rule

If lim f(x)g(x) gives 0⁄0 or ∞⁄∞, then it equals lim f′(x)g′(x), provided that second limit exists.

Check the form first, every time. The rule applies only to 0⁄0 and ∞⁄∞. Applying it to something like 3⁄2 gives a completely wrong answer, and writing "0/0, so by l'Hopital" is usually worth a mark on its own.

It is not the quotient rule. Differentiate the top and the bottom separately. The two things look similar on the page and are completely different operations.

Worked examples

limx→0 sin xx= lim cos x1 = 1 0/0, so the rule applies limx→2 x² − 4x − 2= lim 2x1 = 4 factorising gives the same answer, and is quicker here limx→0 1 − cos xx²= lim sin x2x still 0/0, so apply it again = lim cos x2 = 12

Repeated use is allowed and expected, but check the form again before each application. The moment it stops being indeterminate, stop differentiating and substitute.

Your turn

1. limx→0 ex − 1x is:

2. For limx→1 x + 2x + 1, what should you do?

3. How many times must you apply the rule to limx→0 1 − cos xx²?

Where the marks go

Stating the indeterminate form before using the rule. One line, often one mark, and it is what shows you checked rather than guessed.

Differentiating top and bottom separately and correctly. The quotient rule here is a method error, not an arithmetic one.

Re-checking the form between repeated applications, and stopping as soon as substitution works.

Want a verdict on your own draft?

These pages are free and stay free, but they are general and your IA is not. Send me your research question, or whatever exists so far, and I will tell you in writing whether the topic has a ceiling on it, where the marks are going, and what to change first. That costs nothing and it comes back within 24 hours.

Written by a serving IB Diploma and Career-related Programme Coordinator and Head of Mathematics, who reads internal assessments across every subject group every year. If you then want the whole draft reviewed properly against all five criteria, that is the paid one, and it is refunded if it does not name at least three specific things to fix.

Get a free verdict Full written review, $99

I never write any part of it. Not a sentence, not a calculation, not your data. Under 18: a parent buys this and the thread is with them. I do not work with students at my own school.