Topic 3.9 · AA Higher Level

The minus one is not a reciprocal

At x = 0.5, sin⁻¹x is 0.5236 and 1/sin x is 2.0858. The notation looks like an index and is not one, and the two functions are not even defined in the same places.

x = 0.5
0.5236arcsin x
2.08581/sin x, cosec x
3.98times apart
differentthey are

The dashed box is where arcsin lives. Cosec never enters it, in either direction. Two functions that share no point of the plane are not easy to confuse once you have seen them together.

Three reciprocals, and the pairing people swap

These are just names for three fractions:

NameMeansAt θ = 1
sec θ1 / cos θ1/0.5403 = 1.8508
cosec θ1 / sin θ1/0.8415 = 1.1884
cot θ1 / tan θ1/1.5574 = 0.6421

sec goes with cos and cosec goes with sin. That crossover is the thing people get wrong, and it is worth noticing that the names are deliberately mismatched: the co is on the opposite one each time. No mnemonic for this is reliable, so do the thing that is: write "sec = 1/cos" at the top of the page before you start, every time, and read it off rather than recalling it.

None of the three is ever between −1 and 1, excluding zero, because each is one divided by something that never exceeds 1 in size. So sec θ = 0.5 has no solutions, which is the range check for this sub-topic and the mirror image of the one at 3.6.

Two more Pythagorean identities, for free

Start from cos²θ + sin²θ = 1, which is 3.6, and divide it by cos²θ:

1 + tan²θ = sec²θ

Then divide the original by sin²θ instead:

cot²θ + 1 = cosec²θ

That is the whole derivation, and it is worth doing rather than learning, because the division tells you which identity you are getting: divide by cos² and you get the sec one; divide by sin² and you get the cosec one.

Check at θ = 1: tan 1 = 1.5574, so 1 + tan² = 3.4255; and sec 1 = 1.8508, so sec² = 3.4255. The same to every decimal place the calculator will show.

Use them in the same way as the original: to trade one ratio for another when a question gives you the wrong one. A question with both tan and sec in it is asking for the first identity, and the substitution usually turns the problem into a quadratic.

The inverse functions, and why they need a restricted range

sin, cos and tan are not one-to-one, so strictly they have no inverses. The course fixes this the same way 2.14 fixed x²: restrict until it is one-to-one, then invert. The restriction chosen is what gives each inverse its range.

FunctionDomainRange
arcsin x−1 ≤ x ≤ 1−π/2 to π/2, which is −1.571 to 1.571
arccos x−1 ≤ x ≤ 10 to π, which is 0 to 3.142
arctan xevery real x−π/2 to π/2, not reached

Read the domain column first. arcsin 1.2 does not exist, because no angle has a sine of 1.2, and a calculator will error rather than guess. arctan is the exception: it accepts anything, because a tangent can be any size. arctan 1000 = 1.5698, creeping towards π/2 = 1.5708 without ever arriving, which is the horizontal asymptote of its graph.

The range column is why your calculator gives one answer when a triangle has two. arcsin returns something in −π/2 to π/2 by definition, so it can never hand you an obtuse angle. That is the 3.5 ambiguous case, explained: the machine is not being unhelpful, it is returning the only value its range allows.

One neat relation worth knowing. arcsin x + arccos x = π/2, for every x in −1 to 1. At x = 0.5 that is 0.5236 + 1.0472 = 1.5708. It follows from sin(π/2 − θ) = cos θ, and it makes a pleasant check: if your two inverse values do not add to 1.5708, one of them is wrong.

On the GDC: the key that is not a reciprocal

The machine has no sec, cosec or cot key, which surprises people. You type the reciprocal yourself, and that is the clearest possible statement of what these ratios are.

When you may use it. Analysis Paper 1 is non-calculator, and identity work is Paper 1. The useful calculator job here is proving to yourself that sin⁻¹ and 1/sin are different, which takes two lines.

TI-Nspire CX II

  1. Set doc → Settings → Document Settings → Angle → Radian
  2. Put the two on consecutive lines. sin⁻¹(0.5) gives 0.5236, and 1/sin(0.5) gives 2.0858. Two different numbers from what looks like the same notation
  3. There is no cosec key: type 1/sin(x). For a graph, f1(x)=1/sin(x)
  4. sin⁻¹(1.2) returns an error, which is the domain doing its job. Worth seeing once

Casio fx-CG50

  1. SHIFT MENU SET UP → Angle → Rad
  2. SHIFT sin is sin⁻¹, and it is a different key from the reciprocal. sin⁻¹(0.5) gives 0.5236; 1÷sin(0.5) gives 2.0858
  3. For cot, type 1÷tan(X) rather than looking for a key. In Graph, Y1=1÷tan(X)
  4. The x⁻¹ key gives the reciprocal of whatever is on the screen, so sin(0.5) x⁻¹ is cosec 0.5. That key really is an index and the sin⁻¹ one is not

The mark people lose. Writing sin⁻¹x for 1/sin x, or reading a question's sin⁻¹ as a reciprocal. The notation is genuinely unfortunate and the examiners know it, which is why they write arcsin in the guide. The habit: read sin⁻¹ aloud as "arcsin", never as "sin to the minus one". If you say the word you cannot make the error.

Your turn

1. Find arcsin 0.5, in radians to 4 decimal places.

2. Find sec 1, to 4 decimal places. Work in radians.

3. Given tan θ = 1.5574, find sec²θ to 4 decimal places.

4. Find arcsin 0.5 + arccos 0.5, to 4 decimal places.

5. Why does sec θ = 0.5 have no solutions?

Question 5. Why does secant theta equal 0.5 have no solutions?
Where the marks go

1 markThe correct identity quoted before use.

1 markThe substitution, with the right ratio traded for the right one.

1 markThe answer, with any impossible value rejected and the reason given.

The rejection mark is the same one as at 3.8. A quadratic in sec θ will often hand you a root between −1 and 1, and "no solutions since |sec θ| ≥ 1" is the line that earns it.

Want a verdict on your own draft?

These pages are free and stay free, but they are general and your IA is not. Send me your research question, or whatever exists so far, and I will tell you in writing whether the topic has a ceiling on it, where the marks are going, and what to change first. That costs nothing and it comes back within 24 hours.

Written by a serving IB Diploma and Career-related Programme Coordinator and Head of Mathematics, who reads internal assessments across every subject group every year. If you then want the whole draft reviewed properly against all five criteria, that is the paid one, and it is refunded if it does not name at least three specific things to fix.

Send me your question, free

Already have a full draft? Have the whole thing reviewed against all five criteria, $99.